Joel Frenette, MBA, PMP, CTO | Helping travel agencies grow with customized AI tools and advisor training.
When employees hear “AI transformation,” many do not hear opportunity; they hear countdown.
For many travel advisors, AI does not show up as a friendly co-pilot. It shows up as a vague mandate, a little extra pressure and one big unspoken question: Am I being empowered, or quietly put on the clearance rack? That is why AI anxiety in travel is rarely just a technology problem; it is a leadership problem.
Too often, executives mistake hesitation for resistance to innovation. I see it differently. Travel advisors do not resist AI because they are afraid of progress. They resist it when the rollout feels threatening, confusing or disconnected from the value they know they bring.
I recognized that fear quickly because I had seen this movie before. When online travel agencies surged, many local brick-and-mortar agencies felt the ground shift beneath them. That memory never really left the profession. So when AI entered the conversation, I did not see simple reluctance. I saw a familiar fear that another wave of technology was about to make good people feel less relevant.
AI anxiety is often less about the tool than the story employees think leadership is telling with it. And when that story sounds like, “This is how we do more with fewer people,” trust starts evaporating before adoption even has a chance.
If your AI strategy sounds like a staffing strategy, do not expect trust.
That is why I believe travel executives need to stop treating AI anxiety as employee resistance and start treating it as a leadership signal. In travel, successful AI adoption depends less on how sophisticated the tool is and more on how clearly leaders communicate, how intentionally they manage change and how well they train their people. People do not fear change nearly as much as they fear unclear intent.
Moving From Anxiety To Fluency Starts With Leadership
In my own work with travel advisors, I saw a real tech-skills gap keeping many agents from leaning into AI with confidence. The issue was not intelligence, and it was not willingness. It was fluency. Advisors were asking honest questions: What exactly should I use this for? What if the output is wrong? What if I sound robotic? What if this makes my expertise look less valuable?
So instead of talking about innovation in broad, polished language, I made the response practical. We implemented comprehensive AI training for every agent and built it directly into onboarding. That changed the conversation. Once advisors could see where AI helped, where human judgment still needed to lead and how the tools could support their role rather than diminish it, confidence started replacing hesitation. Nothing reduces fear faster than fluency.
That training worked because it focused on real scenarios, not theater. We worked on the moments that actually matter: building more personalized itineraries, improving response speed without losing warmth, handling exceptions more efficiently and knowing when human judgment should override AI output. Advisors did not need another speech about the future. They needed to know how AI could help them serve travelers better on a Tuesday morning.
That matters even more because travelers are clearly open to AI-enhanced experiences; in Amadeus research released in September 2025, 64% of travelers said they would be willing to use an AI travel assistant for in-trip information, while 25% reported frustrations using generative AI for travel. That is a useful reminder for leaders: customers may want the convenience of AI, but they still need humans who can step in when the technology gets clumsy.
And that is the bigger point. The best AI strategy in travel is not the one that makes advisors more machine-like. It is the one that gives them more room to be human.
As executives, it is our job to replace the fear of “AI will replace me” with a healthier philosophy: You bring the care, empathy and judgment. AI helps you serve people better.
What Leaders Should Do Now
1. Reject the headcount trap. The moment AI becomes shorthand for staff reduction, trust erodes. Employees stop hearing “innovation” and start hearing “budget cuts.” Your best people may start polishing their résumés before your AI plan even gets out of the slideshow phase.
2. Take a visible stance. Be vocal that AI is there to enhance the work, not replace the workforce. That message should not be buried in a slide deck; it needs to be direct, repeated and backed by decisions people can feel.
3. Build a leadership structure around AI. Create a center of excellence, advisory board or steering committee to guide priorities, governance and culture. Without that, AI efforts become fragmented and reactive.
4. Crowdsource the use cases that matter. Ask leaders what they want to improve. Ask frontline employees what they would love to automate, simplify or enhance. The people doing the work usually know where the friction lives and where the best ROI is hiding.
5. Train for real scenarios. Skip abstract theory and generic demos. Focus on personalization, communication, exception handling, brand voice and human override decisions. Make training useful on Monday morning, not just impressive on Thursday afternoon.
6. Cross-train and create career pathways. Give employees opportunities to grow into AI-enabled roles, contribute to pilot programs and help shape implementation. You cannot automate confidence into a workforce you have already unnerved.
Closing Thoughts
In travel, the future does not belong to the companies with the loudest AI strategy. It belongs to those with the clearest one, using AI to add more human value to the experience.
Because the real promise of AI is not simply doing work faster. It is giving advisors more capacity to do the deeply human work travelers remember most: reassuring, guiding, personalizing and solving problems when plans go sideways. Executives who understand that can turn fear into fluency, and fluency into performance.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
